Recently I went into a local phone shop and tried the Nokia Lumia 800, with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango, to see how this was reported by the various web usage trackers.
My first impressions of the much discussed Metro interface was not good, I did not find the tiles intuitive, and found the phone much easier to use when I found by swiping to the left there was a menu system!
The phone I used had the browser string:
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; NOKIA; Lumia 800)
The most striking thing about the identifications made is that there was no commonality in wording between any of the results, but generally these results were accurate. Hence, I will just list the results, rather than group them.
Shiny Stats: Windows Mobile 7 / Internet Explorer Mobile 9x
BraveNet: Windows NT / Explorer
OneStat: Mobile Wap Nokia / Microsoft Internet Explorer Other
SiteMeter: Microsoft Nokia / Internet Explorer 9
StatCounter: Windows Phone / Internet Explorer Mobile 9
GoStats: Windows Phone OS 7.5 / Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.0
24 Log: Other / Internet Explorer Mobile
Extreme Tracking: Windows Phone 7 / Internet Explorer 9
W3: Windows Phone 7 / Internet Explorer 9
Sunday, 8 April 2012
Friday, 19 August 2011
A Sad Day for Tablet Competition, Plus HP TouchPad Identification.
I do not like to see one company having too great a dominance in any market. I have long thought small touch screen portable PCs are a good idea; and then after years of negligible success Apple launch the iPad, as though it is a new idea, and make them fashionable. I hate Apple trying to stifle competition using alleged paten infringements, and trying to take extort money from using the iPad (to me if you buy hardware you should be able to do what you want with it). Thus I was pleased when HP said it was going to take Apple on; from my limited experience WebOS made sense.
I looked forward to the launch of HPs first touch screen, and a few days ago went to a PC shop to have a play with the HP TouchPad. My impression was that it was not perfect, but it was a good first attempt, and would be a stepping stone to a better machine. I would have bought one, however, Opera browser was/is not yet available for the TouchPad, and whilst I am happy to buy a tablet which helps open up the market, I do not wish to buy a tablet which will be used mainly for portable browsing, and will artificially inflate Apple Safari browser market share (see TouchPad Identification below). All things considered I decided that the TouchPad seemed a perfectly acceptable tablet, that I would buy when Opera became available.
Alas, this is a sad day because HP have decided to scrap their WebOS tablets and phones, but maybe I will be able to buy one cheap, and put a straight forward Linux distro on it!
TouchPad Identification
I recently reviewed the identification of the Blackberry Playbook by counters, and found it to suggest that Apple Safari browser usage was higher than it actually is, due to both browsers being based on the WebKit browser engine. Likewise, the TouchPad uses a WebKit based browser, and almost universally is counted as Safari:
Linux OS and Safari browser
ExtremeTracking
ShinyStats
Sitemeter
W3
BeOs (OS and browser)
BraveNet
Mac OS and Safari browser
OneStat
Default Browser
StatCounter
Browser String:
Mozilla/5.0 (hp-tablet; Linux; hpwOS/3.0.0; U; en-GB) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) wOSBrowser/233.70 Safari/534.6 TouchPad/1.0
I looked forward to the launch of HPs first touch screen, and a few days ago went to a PC shop to have a play with the HP TouchPad. My impression was that it was not perfect, but it was a good first attempt, and would be a stepping stone to a better machine. I would have bought one, however, Opera browser was/is not yet available for the TouchPad, and whilst I am happy to buy a tablet which helps open up the market, I do not wish to buy a tablet which will be used mainly for portable browsing, and will artificially inflate Apple Safari browser market share (see TouchPad Identification below). All things considered I decided that the TouchPad seemed a perfectly acceptable tablet, that I would buy when Opera became available.
Alas, this is a sad day because HP have decided to scrap their WebOS tablets and phones, but maybe I will be able to buy one cheap, and put a straight forward Linux distro on it!
TouchPad Identification
I recently reviewed the identification of the Blackberry Playbook by counters, and found it to suggest that Apple Safari browser usage was higher than it actually is, due to both browsers being based on the WebKit browser engine. Likewise, the TouchPad uses a WebKit based browser, and almost universally is counted as Safari:
Linux OS and Safari browser
ExtremeTracking
ShinyStats
Sitemeter
W3
BeOs (OS and browser)
BraveNet
Mac OS and Safari browser
OneStat
Default Browser
StatCounter
Browser String:
Mozilla/5.0 (hp-tablet; Linux; hpwOS/3.0.0; U; en-GB) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) wOSBrowser/233.70 Safari/534.6 TouchPad/1.0
Saturday, 25 June 2011
Blackberry PlayBook ID + Are WebKit Browsers Giving Appel Safari an Overstated Market Share?
Yeasterday I popped into a local computer store to have a play with the Blackberry PlayBook. I dis not spend enough time to write a worthwhile review, but by visiting this site I found that very few stats trackers correctly identify the PlayBook (listed Browser / OS):
Correctly Identified:
W3 - Blackberry PlayBook Tablet 1.0 / RIM Tablet
ExTreame Tracking - Blackberry PlayBook / Blackberry PlayBook
Near Miss:
Statcounter: Blackbery / Blackberry OS
ID As Apple Safari:
Shiny Stats - Safari / Various
Onestat - Safari / Macintosh
24Log - Safari / Other
SiteMeter - Safari 1.3 / Macintosh unknown
GoStats - Safari / Unknown
ID As BeOS:
BraveNet - BeOS / BeOS
From the above it is clear that few correctly identify the BlackBerry PlayBook, and most credit the WebKit Browser as being an Apple Safari browser. Surly, this causes Apples browser (and to a lesser expent Apples OS) to be regarded as more popular than it actually is?
PS Will be nice when BeOS actually does start making plenty of hits again!!
For the record the browser string was:
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayBook; U; RIM Tablet OS 1.0.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/0.0.1 Safari/534.8
Correctly Identified:
W3 - Blackberry PlayBook Tablet 1.0 / RIM Tablet
ExTreame Tracking - Blackberry PlayBook / Blackberry PlayBook
Near Miss:
Statcounter: Blackbery / Blackberry OS
ID As Apple Safari:
Shiny Stats - Safari / Various
Onestat - Safari / Macintosh
24Log - Safari / Other
SiteMeter - Safari 1.3 / Macintosh unknown
GoStats - Safari / Unknown
ID As BeOS:
BraveNet - BeOS / BeOS
From the above it is clear that few correctly identify the BlackBerry PlayBook, and most credit the WebKit Browser as being an Apple Safari browser. Surly, this causes Apples browser (and to a lesser expent Apples OS) to be regarded as more popular than it actually is?
PS Will be nice when BeOS actually does start making plenty of hits again!!
For the record the browser string was:
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayBook; U; RIM Tablet OS 1.0.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/0.0.1 Safari/534.8
Friday, 3 June 2011
Fell Onto My Left Wrist Last Week
Thursday, 5 May 2011
Lonliness of a FreeBSD Surfer
Earlier today I surfed onto a site called Pool tot Pool. Noticing an ExtremeTracking button I had a look - I just cannot help it! This tracker ha been running since 25th November 2006, in that time it has had 10,110 hits, yet I am the first person to surf onto the site using FreeBSD, and my visit puts FreeBSD usage to 0.01%.

However, Net Applications give the percentage Internet traffic for FreeBSD as 0.01%, so I suppose satistically, after 10,109 hits, it was time for me to find this site!

However, Net Applications give the percentage Internet traffic for FreeBSD as 0.01%, so I suppose satistically, after 10,109 hits, it was time for me to find this site!
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Opera 11 Alpha
Today Opera 11 Alpha was released. I decided to see how the different counters recorded Opera 11 Alpha on its first day.
Opera 11 Alpha used on FreeBSD:
Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386; U; en) Presto/2.6.37 Version/11.00
No result:
BraveNet - Fails to count Opera 9 / 10 and now 11!
Belstat
GoStats - not working at time of test
W3Counter (Browser ID: Identification Blocked 0)
Opera 9
OneStat
SiteMeter
24Log
ExtremeTracking
Opera 10
Clicky
OPERA 11
ShinyStats
Statcounter
Motigo
Full marks / flexibility to ShinyStats, Statcounter, and Motigo. I'm also sure ExtremeTracking will register Opera 11 before too long.
Opera 11 Alpha used on FreeBSD:
Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386; U; en) Presto/2.6.37 Version/11.00
No result:
BraveNet - Fails to count Opera 9 / 10 and now 11!
Belstat
GoStats - not working at time of test
W3Counter (Browser ID: Identification Blocked 0)
Opera 9
OneStat
SiteMeter
24Log
ExtremeTracking
Opera 10
Clicky
OPERA 11
ShinyStats
Statcounter
Motigo
Full marks / flexibility to ShinyStats, Statcounter, and Motigo. I'm also sure ExtremeTracking will register Opera 11 before too long.
Monday, 5 July 2010
iPad Identification.
I recently had a play with an iPad in a local shop. Once I got over the problem of it auto-correcting the address from blogspot to bloodsport I was able to see how the different counters recorded my visit:
iPad / Safari:
ExtremeTracking
StatCounter
Shiny
Mac OSX / Safari:
SiteMeter
Brave Net
24Log
iPhone / Safari Mobile:
Clicky
Max OSX / Safari Mobile:
OneStats
iPad / Safari:
ExtremeTracking
StatCounter
Shiny
Mac OSX / Safari:
SiteMeter
Brave Net
24Log
iPhone / Safari Mobile:
Clicky
Max OSX / Safari Mobile:
OneStats
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



